Forum > Chess
Analysis Requests
Dr. Egregious:
As I mentioned before, I thought it might be fun and informative if I started this thread, and my workload has finally cleared up to allow it; if you've finished with a game and you'd like some advice and constructive criticism move by move, feel free to copy/paste your PGN here, and I'll try to have it done within twenty-four hours. If you just want feedback on a few particular moves, I can do that in short order. :)
Taylor:
SHANE vs TAYLOR
01. e4 g5
02. Nh3 f6
03. Bb5 Nh6
04. d4 c6
05. O-O g4
06. Qxg4 f5
07. Ng5 f4
08. Qh5+ Nf7
09. Nxf7 Qa5
10. Nd6+ Kd8
11. Qe8+ Kc7
12. Qxc8+ Kxd6
13. e5+ Kd5
14. Nc3+ Ke6
15. Bc4+ Kf5
16. g4+ fxg3 e.p.
17. fxg3+ Kg6
18. Bd3+ Kg7
19. Rf4 kg8
20. Qxf8++
I already know about the first part where I deliberately wanted Shane to win via a Fool's Mate on Black's side.
At some point a game of "Tag" appeared to start; the King was running for his life most of the time :))
Was there anything I missed, after post 9459 when Shane wrote a wall of text?
There was an error in your notation on turn 16.
Pawns can't just magically jump to the same row as the opposing team's starting row. :P ~ KarjamP
Shane:
This post and this post should probably help out. Taylor invoked En Passant, so Taylor's f4 Pawn could capture a pawn on g4 and move to g3.
... Right?
KarjamP:
I had figured out the problem and actually fixed it: The notation said that Taylor's pawn moved two steps forward to en passant instead of one step: an invalid move.
Taylor:
Ergo, Shane slipped up, not me. :P
The notation was a copy/paste from our match after he won.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version